<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PHP: speed of string replacement functions</title>
	<link>http://www.tummblr.com/web-development/php/php-speed-of-string-replacement-functions/</link>
	<description>Records of my tumblings through the intarwebs</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: HM2K.com &#187; 50+ PHP optimisation tips revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.tummblr.com/web-development/php/php-speed-of-string-replacement-functions/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>HM2K.com &#187; 50+ PHP optimisation tips revisited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 17:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tummblr.com/web-development/php/php-speed-of-string-replacement-functions/#comment-335</guid>
		<description>[...] str_replace is faster than preg_replace, str_replace is best overall, however strtr is sometimes quicker with larger strings. Using array() inside str_replace is usually quicker than multiple str_replace. [Citation] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] str_replace is faster than preg_replace, str_replace is best overall, however strtr is sometimes quicker with larger strings. Using array() inside str_replace is usually quicker than multiple str_replace. [Citation] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.154 seconds -->
